For America to Pay Her Bills, the Debt Ceiling Doesn’t Need to be Raised: Why the Confusion?

0 0
Read Time:4 Minute, 57 Second

ITALY, May 26th, 2023. In the bargaining over raising the debt ceiling, not one member of Congress, the Treasury Department, or the Biden Administration is acknowledging the fact that interest on the national debt can be paid without raising the debt ceiling.

Put in its entirety—the debt ceiling is the limit to which the federal government can borrow money. The interest on the national debt, lack of payment for which Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen has warned will cause “an economic and financial catastrophe,” doesn’t need to be paid for with borrowed money.

According to Treasury Department data, tax revenue is $4.66 trillion, while the annual interest payments on the debt in fiscal year 2022 amounted to $724 billion.

So the money for “America to pay its bills” is there. Why isn’t anyone bringing this up? The debate in Congress, which is coming down to the wire, has nothing to do with whether or not America can pay its bills, but whether it will be permitted to borrow money to pay its bills. The same goes for all the potential solutions, laid out cleanly in various “plans” here; America will be allowed to borrow money to pay its bills or do so by force, or it will make some agreement to be allowed to.

On May 10th, Secretary Yellen said a default “would spark a global downturn that would set us back much further. It would also risk undermining US global economic leadership and raise questions about our ability to defend our national security interests”.

If such risks exist, why can’t the relatively small increase year-over-year from 2022’s interest payments be met with slightly more tax revenue? Are Americans to believe there is not one single program or agency whose work is worth less than the risk of “an economic and financial catastrophe,” and cut be scaled back to prevent it?

While future spending cuts, even massive ones, have been proposed by the Republicans in Congress as a concession from the White House in exchange for a raise in the debt ceiling, no one, not even the Republicans holding the keys, has mentioned that cutting a part of spending now would avoid the so-termed “X-date” and “economic and financial catastrophe”.

Essentially, the determination has been that the federal government cannot pay its bills if it can’t be allowed to borrow money to pay for them, a sentence which on its face would flunk someone out of every economics class.

PICTURED: Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen.

Under the Big Top

On Tuesday, the Biden team said they were continuing to negotiate with Speaker of the House Kevin McCarthy over a “smaller and smaller” circle of items, including “reforms to energy permitting, new work requirements for some forms of federal aid, and the redistribution of unused Covid-19 emergency funds,” reported mainstream news.

Reports of what a default could mean to the US economy have been stark, with a CNN report citing 8 million jobs evaporating, and an op-ed from The Hill suggesting tens of thousands of lives could be lost, indicating the economic downturn from the Great Recession of 2007-2009 pushed 100 million people into extreme poverty.

If that’s the case, if there’s an understanding of those sorts of risks, then why would any agency or program be spared from the chopping block? Whether it’s been spent or not, the US Army Corps of Engineers had a plan in 2019 to spend $800 million on booby traps to control Asian carp in the Great Lakes. Is that program worth more than defaulting on the national debt payments?

In 2019, an audit of the Pentagon cost $428 million to conduct and another $472 million to fix problems the audit uncovered. This is despite the fact that the Pentagon has failed the last 7 audits. They’ve never even come close to passing one.

$4.5 billion was signed off on last August in order to pay for the Ukrainian pension plan and other social programs, which in light of “an economic and financial catastrophe” would seem an easy cut.

In the 2021 bipartisan infrastructure bill passed under Biden, there’s a variety of fringe spending, from $5 billion to buy all-new electric school buses, to $7.5 billion to build electric charging stations, to $65 billion to upgrade broadband internet connections.

It would take no time at all for Congress to defund these fringe projects and pay the interest on the debt without an increase in borrowing costs.

Since 1960, the debt ceiling has been raised 80 times. As far as checks on power go, one could call it porous at best. Furthermore, most increases have been preceded by a game of political chicken, ultimately and up until now, always ending in an increase in the borrowing limit.

Based on these criteria, the national media routinely refers to it as a “circus”. But the real circus comes in the form of what this demonstrates to nations and groups who lend the US government the money it wishes to borrow.

By omitting the fact that current spending could be sacrificed to pay back those who have loaned the government money, the Treasury Department has designated the nation’s creditors as the absolute lowest point on the totem pole—to be paid back only with borrowed money, and less deserving than any and all other federal programs. WaL

PICTURED ABOVE: Kevin McCarthy as a congressman.

Happy
Happy
0 %
Sad
Sad
0 %
Excited
Excited
0 %
Sleepy
Sleepy
0 %
Angry
Angry
0 %
Surprise
Surprise
0 %

The Sunday Catchup provides all the week's stories, so you never start the week uninformed

Average Rating

5 Star
0%
4 Star
0%
3 Star
0%
2 Star
0%
1 Star
0%

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *