Ukrainian Counteroffensive—Afghanistan Teaches that “Steady Progress” is Code for Losing

0 0
Read Time:4 Minute, 43 Second

For a week now, the long-publicized Ukrainian counteroffensive has been raging, and US officials have gone on record saying it’s “not meeting expectations on any front”.

One of the US officials speaking with CNN described the Ukrainian forces as “vulnerable” to minefields and Russian forces as “competent”.

Multiple high-level US war planners including President Biden, Secretary of State Blinken, and Sect. of Defense Lloyd Austin, suggested that Ukraine was well-prepared for a counterattack and that no peace agreement should be reached until such an attack allows the country to take back the territory which Russia unilaterally annexed last year.

Very rarely is it expressed in detail the difficulty of planning such a military operation—attacking a dug-in opponent who is not only better equipped but who also outnumbers you. Typically attackers must outnumber defenders for offensive operations to be successful.

President Zelenskyy has admitted progress was “slower than desired,” but that “no matter how far we advance in our counteroffensive, we will not agree to a frozen conflict because that is war, that is a prospectless development for Ukraine”.

“This is a very difficult fight, it is a very violent fight and It will likely take a considerable amount of time and at high cost,” Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Gen. Mark Milley said in his typically blunt manner at the recent meeting of the Ukraine Contact Group in Brussels.

A gathering of military planners from 50 nations that seek to support Ukraine in the war, the contact group heard a talk by one US general who bucked the media narrative, declaring the Ukrainian attack was making “steady progress”.

The choice of words, whether this general was aware of it or not, should ring alarm bells for American readers, as these two words were repeatedly used in the statements of dozens of military officers and politicians, now known to be lies, regarding the events of the Afghan War.

PICTURED: U.S. Soldiers depart Forward Operating Base Baylough, Afghanistan. PC: U.S. Army. CC 2.0.

Progressing backwards

Many of the following quotes were taken by the Washington Post’s Afghanistan Papers.

“We’re making some steady progress,” Maj. Gen. Jeffrey Schloesser, commander of the 101st Airborne Division, told reporters in September 2008.

“We are making steady progress, Marine Capt. Abraham Sipe told Reuters in response to an email in Feb. 2010. “In many parts of Marjah, we have seen very little opposition. There are areas where Marines have met with stiff resistance, but they are making steady progress throughout the area”.

“First, we are steadily making deliberate progress,” said Army Lt. Gen. David Rodriguez at a news conference in Kabul after NATO and US casualties began reaching new highs in 2010.

“The past eight months have seen important but hard-fought progress,” said Gen. David Petraeus before Congress in March 2011.

“The campaign, as I’ve pointed out before, I think has made significant progress,” Sect. of Defense Leon Panetta told reporters that same year, even though he had just dodged a suicide bomb attack.

Then, as the war began moving towards building up the Afghan National Security Forces, the same tune emerged but in a different context. In the 2013 Report on Progress Toward Security and Stability in Afghanistan, submitted to Congress in November, the DoD authors said that the transition between the US/NATO forces and the ANSF was “on track for completion by the end of 2014, and most districts are making steady progress”.

The NATO Sect. General Fogh Rasmussen said in 2014 that the transition from NATO forces to ANSF was making steady progress, though he wasn’t quoted using those exact words in the article.

PICTURED: Taliban fighters take pictures with their weapons in the vacant presidential office in Kabul. PC: Taliban (handout), via New York Post.

Similarly, writing for the Defense Department website in 2016, staffer Liza Ferdinando quoted Army Brig. Gen. Charles H. Cleveland as saying that the ANSF were making slow and steady progress and gains, in the fighting season with the Taliban.

That same year, after a surge in Taliban attacks on major cities, Army Gen. John W. Nicholson Jr., the commander of US forces in Afghanistan at the time, told reporters “we are seeing some progress”.

As the Post reported about US/NATO counterinsurgency efforts in Afghanistan, it was all lies, and that nearly all of the war was conducted without any coherent strategy that could have defined what “progress” meant. Then the month of August 2021 picked up the narrative where Rasmussen left off, showing just how much progress the ANSF had made in securing the country in NATO’s absence when they lost the whole nation in 3 weeks of combat.

While Ukraine most certainly has a more motivated army than the government in Kabul did, and while the Ukrainian general staff will certainly have an idea of what progress would mean, the Discord Leaks already demonstrated that the DoD had been understating Ukrainian losses, and overstating their chances at a successful counterattack.

Therefore it should surprise no one if “steady progress” becomes a byword for failure.

Happy
Happy
0 %
Sad
Sad
0 %
Excited
Excited
0 %
Sleepy
Sleepy
0 %
Angry
Angry
0 %
Surprise
Surprise
0 %

The Sunday Catchup provides all the week's stories, so you never start the week uninformed

Average Rating

5 Star
0%
4 Star
0%
3 Star
0%
2 Star
0%
1 Star
0%

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *