Biden Yet Again Says the U.S. Military Would Battle China Over Taiwan

0 0
Read Time:3 Minute, 28 Second

In a television interview, President Biden yet again claimed the U.S. military is ready to battle the Chinese if they attempt to take the island of Taiwan by force.

It’s the 4th time in 13 months that Biden has outspokenly contradicted what his press team has repeatedly assured is still the U.S. policy—that Taiwan is an indivisible part of China which Washington would like to see reunified with the mainland peacefully, but who can also purchase military equipment for its own defense.

The comment came on 60 Minutes, and like the last time Biden made such a claim during a May interview in Tokyo, he doubled down during the reporter’s clarification.

In this case, he said the U.S. would defend Taiwan if there were “an unprecedented attack”. China has never attempted to invade Taiwan, so any attack would be unprecedented, which would mean the U.S. is currently guaranteeing Taiwan’s independence by the might of her armies.

Like the May interview, he confirmed that was the commitment the U.S. had to the island, but contradicted himself later by saying the U.S. maintains the “one-China policy”. His spokesperson also followed up the interview.

“The president has said this before, including in Tokyo earlier this year,” the spokesperson said. “He also made clear then that our Taiwan policy hasn’t changed. That remains true”.

These comments come just days after the Senate Foreign Relations Committee sent to the floor a bill containing the largest restructuring of U.S.-Taiwan relations in history, establishing the island as an independent nation with official titles, heraldry, embassy, and right to participate in international organizations like the UN.

It also would, if passed, designate the island a major non-NATO ally, and organize an additional $6.5 billion in arms sales.

PICTURED: Nancy Pelosi stands with Taiwan President Tsai Ing-wen.

50 days of ambiguity

The official policy for 40 years towards Taiwan has been called “Strategic Ambiguity,” meaning that the U.S. is ambiguous towards the activity of Taiwan as an independent entity, apart from through the sales of weaponry.

Instead, since House Speaker Pelosi’s much-publicized visit to Taiwan in August, Beijing has been viewing an increasingly ambiguous Washington regarding to what degree the executive and legislative branches desire to change relations between themselves, China, and Taiwan.

Biden was ambiguous about Pelosi’s visit, and chose to neither actively support it nor actively condemn it. Statements at the time indicated Biden didn’t like the idea, but pretended he couldn’t do anything to stop her.

When the Senate committee voted 17-5 on the Taiwan Policy Act, Biden’s National Security Advisor was ambiguous in an interview with Bloomberg, saying there were some elements the Administration favored, and others which are more concerning.

On top of this, there’s been non-stop ambiguity over whether the U.S. will militarily defend Taipei from attack by the mainland.

The sum total hearkens back to other uncoordinated attempts by the U.S. to act on the world stage, such as the NATO-sponsored bombing and overthrow of Libyan dictator Muammar Gaddafi, in which the State Department under Hilary Clinton seemed to think that a liberal tolerant democracy would bloom after a group of armed jihadist insurrectionists were paid to remove the only central authority in the country. WaL

 

PICTURED: The Carl Vinson and Abraham Lincoln Carrier Strike Groups together make up the bulk of the Navy’s Pacific Command fleet, and the most likely forces to combat China in the event of an invasion of Taiwan.

Happy
Happy
0 %
Sad
Sad
0 %
Excited
Excited
0 %
Sleepy
Sleepy
0 %
Angry
Angry
0 %
Surprise
Surprise
0 %

The Sunday Catchup provides all the week's stories, so you never start the week uninformed

Average Rating

5 Star
0%
4 Star
0%
3 Star
0%
2 Star
0%
1 Star
0%

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *